Community
Participate
Working Groups
Build Identifier: Version: 3.7.1.r37x_v20110729-9gF7UHOxFtniV7mI3T556iZN9AU8bEZ1lHMcVK Build id: M20110909-1335 It will be nice to simplify font zooming in Eclipse IDE. It could be created by use: - Shift/Ctrl + Scroll_Wheel (example in GIMP); - Scroll Widget (example in LibreOffice); - Some key press (example - Ctrl+Shift+'+' Ctrl+Shift+'-')... Reproducible: Always
Are you talking about the text editor? I'm guessing you are.
Not only in text editor, but also (if it possible) in Tips-widget and in "Problems", "Outlie",... sections IDE - if zooming start and section is under focus. It will be very useful to the people with vision problems.
Having 'pinch zoom' support in Eclipse (editors) would be nice :-)
Editor zooming support would be bug 84776. I'm not sure how feasible it is to achieve zooming at a widget level.
I have not enough knowledge on java, but if I had solved a similar problem, when I create (initialize) widget instance "tips" would be passed on to him not only the coordinates of the cursor - to determine the location of the widget, and increasing the font size (ie, there do not need to keep track of zooming events)..
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 84776 ***
(In reply to comment #6) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 84776 *** I'm sorry, but I think that even though implementation of these 2 requests lead to the same result, but the realization of - different. In my query, we are talking about the possibility of increasing the font size in any way possible (even without using the mouse wheel, for example, so as not to take your hands off the keyboard when you change / learning source code).
Okay, see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=84776#c11 is that okay ? The feature request is in Bug 84776, the way the user controls the feature should be discussed in there (in my opinion).
(In reply to comment #8) > Okay, see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=84776#c11 > > is that okay ? > The feature request is in Bug 84776, the way the user controls the feature > should be discussed in there (in my opinion). Thank you very much for your work.