Bug 30 - [CVS Core] server .cvsignore file should be considered by client (1GCC6MB)
Summary: [CVS Core] server .cvsignore file should be considered by client (1GCC6MB)
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Team (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P5 normal with 3 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-VCM-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 38236 71263 99332 205979 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-10-10 21:35 EDT by Jean-Michel Lemieux CLA
Modified: 2009-05-06 12:06 EDT (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
mobileauction (1.47 KB, application/octet-stream)
2008-07-14 22:30 EDT, Ricardo Gaebler CLA 		no flags Details
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jean-Michel Lemieux CLA 2001-10-10 21:35:15 EDT 
We currently ignore the cvsignore file on the server, this may of been configured for the
	whole project by the administrator. Our implementation of the cvs adapter should read this
	file.

NOTES:
Comment 1 DJ Houghton CLA 2001-10-23 23:40:07 EDT 
PRODUCT VERSION:
	0.044
Comment 2 Kevin McGuire CLA 2002-04-17 16:23:34 EDT 
post 2.0
Comment 3 Michael Valenta CLA 2002-09-06 21:01:53 EDT 
Reopening
Comment 4 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-05-29 10:39:26 EDT 
*** Bug 38236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 C. Lamont Gilbert CLA 2003-09-22 11:23:45 EDT 
Their are two different behaviors currently with 2.1.1.

First do a cvs shronize.  Then if from the synchronize winow in outgoing mode,
you click on one of the files and choose "add to .ignore" then Eclipse will add
that file inside the cvs .ignore file and then it starts CVS and does something.

But if you click that same file in the Navigator, right click and choose "add to
.ignore" then it happens instantly, and CVS does not run.  Is this correct to
have these two different behaviors?

Also, I added .cvsignore to .cvsignore because the behavior gave me the
impression that it was a local file.  But I am not so sure now.  We need
resolution on this.
Comment 6 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-09-22 14:22:44 EDT 
The difference in behavior is due to the recalulation of the contents in the 
sycnrhonize view. In 2.1, this only occured when the operation was executed 
from the view. In 3.0, the new live synch view is updated in both cases.

As for the .cvsignore file, most people commit this file to their repositories.
Comment 7 Jean-Michel Lemieux CLA 2004-08-03 13:10:49 EDT 
*** Bug 71263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-05-09 09:22:38 EDT 
There is currently no plan to address this item.
Comment 9 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-06-10 08:53:58 EDT 
*** Bug 99332 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Szymon Brandys CLA 2007-10-11 06:14:43 EDT 
The resolution LATER is deprecated and there are still duplicates raised against the issue.
Comment 11 Szymon Brandys CLA 2007-10-11 06:16:07 EDT 
*** Bug 205979 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Ricardo Gaebler CLA 2008-07-14 22:30:53 EDT 
Created attachment 107407 [details]
mobileauction
Comment 13 Szymon Brandys CLA 2009-05-06 12:06:15 EDT 
This bug is not going to be fixed. If there is anyone who is willing to work on that, feel free to reopen while attaching a patch.