Bug 287032 - [Workbench] User notification about slow startup because of refresh (after crash)
Summary: [Workbench] User notification about slow startup because of refresh (after cr...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.5   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows Server 2003
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform UI Triaged CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-19 04:56 EDT by Sebastian Leske CLA
Modified: 2019-09-06 16:12 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sebastian Leske CLA 2009-08-19 04:56:15 EDT
As described e.g. in bug 179439, when an instance of Eclipse was not shut down properly (crash of Eclipse, computer crash...), Eclipse will do some sort of refreshing on next startup, which can take a long time (several minutes).

While it would be nice to avoid this, there are probably scenarios where the startup delay is inevitable. For these cases, it is important to at least provide feedback to the user what is going on.

At present, Eclipse just seems to hang while displaying the splash screen, which is confusing and may lead the user to believe Eclipse is hung.

There should be some indication that Eclipse is refreshing its state, and that this may take a while. Preferrably, the indication should be non-modal (so startup will not be interrupted).
Comment 1 Sebastian Leske CLA 2009-08-19 04:58:39 EDT
Possible solutions:

* a special progress window instead/after the regular splash screen, indicating refresh progress

or 

* a message inserted into the splash screen image

Proposed text:

"Eclipse was not shut down properly and needs to re-initialize. This may take a while..."
Comment 2 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 16:12:56 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.