Bug 28162 - [Tasks] adding only 266 items takes 700ms (under a profiler)
Summary: [Tasks] adding only 266 items takes 700ms (under a profiler)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 44443
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 2.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P2 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-UI-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: performance
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-12-12 08:47 EST by Adam Kiezun CLA
Modified: 2004-02-26 00:55 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Adam Kiezun CLA 2002-12-12 08:47:24 EST
not sure, but that sounds a bit slow
for 2000 markers (the default size in the filter) that'd be 7 seconds just to 
update the task list.
Comment 1 Adam Kiezun CLA 2002-12-12 08:48:05 EST
not really major - but a heads up (although i suspect thet you know)
Comment 2 Marco Qualizza CLA 2003-01-14 13:27:39 EST
Actually, for 2000 items when you're filtering, the time to display should be
somehwere around "0".  After all, all you see is:
There are too many items to display.
To see the items in this window, adjust the filter settings.

(I know, that makes the filter useless.)

More timings (by the watch) of how long Eclipse is "Updating" after a complete
build:
(Win2k, PIII-866, 1 Gig of ram -- the only filter I'm using limits #of items
displayed)
827 items (no filter): ~123 seconds

Setting the filter to 10 and rebuilding: ~50 seconds

Removing the filter (without rebuilding): ~5 seconds

2000 items (of ~7500): Killed after 15 minutes (during which the UI was
*completely* unresponsive, not even repainting.)

So, what *is* Eclipse doing when it's Updating after a complete build but before
it displays items?  Whatever it is, it's pretty intensive....
Comment 3 Dennis Stetsenko CLA 2003-10-20 16:22:41 EDT
*** Bug 45168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Stefan Xenos CLA 2004-02-26 00:55:10 EST
Heh. This one was a satisfying one to fix. :-)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44443 ***