Bug 277972 - make the summary taller and move priority icon the to left of the summary
Summary: make the summary taller and move priority icon the to left of the summary
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Mylyn (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.2   Edit
Assignee: David Shepherd CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: noteworthy
Depends on:
Blocks: 272092
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-05-26 20:02 EDT by Steffen Pingel CLA
Modified: 2009-06-01 19:19 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
shared file (7.46 KB, text/plain)
2009-05-27 13:06 EDT, David Shepherd CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Steffen Pingel CLA 2009-05-26 20:02:12 EDT 
Improve the header layout:
 * Make priority an icon with a drop-down and move it to the left of the summary
 * Increase the font-size for the summary editor (e.g. 120% of the standard size)
 * Right align the status labels

Mock up that shows the proposed layout: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=137190
Comment 1 David Shepherd CLA 2009-05-27 13:06:48 EDT 
Created attachment 137372 [details]
shared file

A first draft of a patch to address this bug
Comment 2 Steffen Pingel CLA 2009-05-28 00:01:23 EDT 
Great stuff! I have applied the patch with some additional refactorings.
Comment 3 David Shepherd CLA 2009-05-28 13:50:38 EDT 
The current layout of the second line of the header is a bit different than the mockup (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=137190).  This was necessary, since some of the information to show was changed.  However, the left alignment of the second row was dropped, and the text now aligns with the summary box instead of the left of the editor.  From a design point-of-view we should review this change.  

Mockup:
[priority][summary                  	    ]
[assignedto]		[bugid][date] [date]

Current implementation:
[priority][summary 						 	]
		    [status]		[bugid][date] [date]