Bug 264686 - [Themes] org.eclipse.ui.themes.fontDefinition needs a fontFactory like colorDefintion has
Summary: [Themes] org.eclipse.ui.themes.fontDefinition needs a fontFactory like colorD...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P5 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform UI Triaged CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: helpwanted
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-02-12 09:35 EST by Tod Creasey CLA
Modified: 2019-09-06 15:38 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tod Creasey CLA 2009-02-12 09:35:12 EST
The fontDefinition element of a theme needs to have factory like the colorDefinition does as it is not possible to define modifications of other fonts.

For instance we want to use a bolded version of the system font and would need a factory class to find the font and bold it.
Comment 1 Kevin McGuire CLA 2009-04-14 12:10:38 EDT
As per http://wiki.eclipse.org/Platform_UI/Bug_Triage_Change_2009
Comment 2 Boris Bokowski CLA 2009-11-17 11:33:24 EST
Susan is now responsible for watching the [Themes] category.
Comment 3 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 15:33:13 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.
Comment 4 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 15:38:22 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.