Bug 262739 - [perfs] Several "Separate JRE Build*" tests got a regression
Summary: [perfs] Several "Separate JRE Build*" tests got a regression
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Ant (show other bugs)
Version: 3.5   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-Ant-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords: performance, test
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-01-28 07:41 EST by Frederic Fusier CLA
Modified: 2022-01-10 11:36 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Frederic Fusier CLA 2009-01-28 07:41:00 EST 
Looking at I20090127-0100 results, it looks like several "Separate JRE Build" tests got a regression on all performance machines.

Here are the detailed numbers:
Win XP Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)				
	builds		Separate	S. JRE Build;	S. JRE Build;
			JRE Build	-debug		links
M4	I20081211-1908	0.3%		-0.1%		0.4%
	I20081216-0800	-0.1%		-0.1%		0.4%
	I20090106-0800	-0.1%		-0.2%		0.3%
	I20090113-0918	-0.5%		-0.7%		1.1%
	I20090120-0920	-16.5%		-19.8%		-12.2%
	N20090122-2000	-17.3%		-20.0%		-14.9%
	I20090125-2000	-18.1%		-21.6%		-16.0%
	I20090127-0100	-17.7%		-21.3%		-16.1%

SLED 10 Sun 1.5.0_10 (2 x 3.00GHz - 3GB RAM)
	builds		Separate	S. JRE Build;
			JRE Build	-debug
M4	I20081211-1908	1.9%		1.2%
	I20081216-0800	2.6%		-1.5%
	I20090106-0800	0.0%		2.0%
	I20090113-0918	2.9%		0.0%
	I20090114-1322	0.8%		0.7%
	I20090120-0920	-6.8%		-3.3%
	N20090122-2000	-7.1%		-4.4%
	I20090125-2000	-7.7%		-5.0%
	I20090127-0100	-8.6%		-5.5%

It clearly looks like a regression was introduced since build I20090120-0920
Comment 1 Frederic Fusier CLA 2009-03-17 13:09:32 EDT 
What is the status for this issue? Is there a chance that something will be done for M7?
Comment 2 Darin Wright CLA 2009-03-17 13:36:39 EDT 
No one is actively working on this. However, someone on the debug team will try to look at this during M7.
Comment 3 Darin Wright CLA 2009-04-14 10:57:22 EDT 
Needs investigation.
Comment 4 Darin Wright CLA 2009-04-28 12:57:57 EDT 
Removed from summary since we have not had a chance to investigate. Leaving open.
Comment 5 Frederic Fusier CLA 2009-04-28 13:00:50 EDT 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Removed from summary since we have not had a chance to investigate. Leaving
> open.
> 
Hence remove the dependency to 3.5 performances root bug...
Comment 6 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 16:13:55 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.
Comment 7 Eclipse Genie CLA 2022-01-10 11:36:18 EST 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're closing this bug.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it and reopen this bug. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.