Bug 262306 - Need to jar-up bundles for Galileo
Summary: Need to jar-up bundles for Galileo
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: WTP ServerTools
Classification: WebTools
Component: wst.server (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows Vista
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: Future   Edit
Assignee: Angel Vera CLA
QA Contact: Tim deBoer CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 253855
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-01-24 22:27 EST by David Williams CLA
Modified: 2009-05-13 16:46 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Williams CLA 2009-01-24 22:27:44 EST 
I think some of these are scheduled to be removed? 

But, if not, we should jar them up, or justify why they can not be. 

In particular, I'm pretty sure the "documentation" one can be jarred up. 

org.apache.cactus

org.eclipse.jst.server.generic.jboss
org.eclipse.jst.server.generic.jonas
org.eclipse.jst.server.generic.oc4j
org.eclipse.jst.server.websphere.core

org.eclipse.servertools.doc.isv
Comment 1 Angel Vera CLA 2009-01-26 10:48:01 EST 
We made org.eclipse.servertools.doc.isv a jar using bug# 251234.

The rest needs to be investigated
Comment 2 David Williams CLA 2009-01-26 11:26:23 EST 
(In reply to comment #1)
> We made org.eclipse.servertools.doc.isv a jar using bug# 251234.
> 
> The rest needs to be investigated
> 

be sure to confirm that doc jar in recent build ... I got my list from a recent build, so may not be jarred as you think?
Comment 3 Angel Vera CLA 2009-01-26 14:54:18 EST 
I just checked on the latest 3.1, and the 3.0.4 build and org.eclipse.servertools.doc.isv is jarred in both cases. 

As far as I know cactus was marked for removal, but don't know about the others. Will look into it for the Galileo release.
Comment 4 Tim deBoer CLA 2009-01-27 20:44:48 EST 
I agree this needs to be done.

FYI, the rest are generic server adapter plugins. When we did the original jarring several releases ago Gorkem was worried that jarring would break the reading of the xml definition file or some of the ant tasks and AFAIK never got around to trying to jar them. We'll either need to ask him to try or make sure we have enough test coverage if we make the changes ourselves.
Comment 5 Angel Vera CLA 2009-03-19 09:44:12 EDT 
This was slip to M7. We will need to request for PMC approval when we are ready to check this in.
Comment 6 Angel Vera CLA 2009-05-13 16:46:56 EDT 
Deferring out of WTP 3.1, unless I hear that is is required for some adopter.