Bug 257943 - [TabbedProperties] Examples need to support Multi-instance Properties View
Summary: [TabbedProperties] Examples need to support Multi-instance Properties View
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.5   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Anthony Hunter CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 248103
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-12-08 11:38 EST by Anthony Hunter CLA
Modified: 2019-09-06 15:34 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anthony Hunter CLA 2008-12-08 11:38:03 EST 
Currently, some of the examples cache a single tabbed properties view instance. This will be bad practice going forward not that you can have multiple instances of the properties view (and can pin them to a selection).

We need to fix in the examples to provide guidance to other projects who also cache a single instance. Most Eclipse GMF editors seem to cache the instance.
Comment 1 Boris Bokowski CLA 2009-05-06 14:51:18 EDT 
Removing target milestone from the past. Is this still planned for 3.5?
Comment 2 Anthony Hunter CLA 2009-05-11 12:15:39 EDT 
Yes, we need to address in Galileo.
Comment 3 Boris Bokowski CLA 2009-05-11 12:55:58 EDT 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yes, we need to address in Galileo.

Can you target this for a concrete milestone please?
Comment 4 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 15:34:46 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.