Community
Participate
Working Groups
1. Copy a Java CU to another project (X) 2. Start editing the CU in X in the Java editor 3. Copy the same CU again to X 4. Choose "replace" in the dialog that pops-up (Note: The file in the editor is NOT replaced) 5. Save the file that you started to edit ==> "Update Conflict" dialog appears. Replace means replace to me. It is hard to understand why a workbench operation only acts on the file system but not on the workbench itself. Maybe the dialog could be smart and warn the user about the fact that the file is open in the editor and that the editor content will be lost. The user could then either go on and the tool would do what the user told it to do (i.e. replace) or press cancel and eventually save the edited file under another name. NOTES: EG (7/10/01 11:07:04 AM) the current behaviour is the designed and agreed upon one. Moving to ITPUI it is interesting user feedback.
PRODUCT VERSION: 0.9
No plans to change current 2.0 behavior