Bug 250662 - [Workbench] Cycle to View dialog, dialog cutoff with long view names
Summary: [Workbench] Cycle to View dialog, dialog cutoff with long view names
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: IDE (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform UI Triaged CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-10-13 11:48 EDT by Joe Luebker CLA
Modified: 2019-09-06 16:05 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments
a screenshot (1.74 MB, image/bmp)
2008-10-13 11:48 EDT, Joe Luebker CLA
no flags Details
better screenshot to help to demostrate the dialog being cutoff (119.10 KB, image/pjpeg)
2008-10-22 11:54 EDT, Joe Luebker CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joe Luebker CLA 2008-10-13 11:48:52 EDT
Created attachment 114953 [details]
a screenshot

Build ID: M20071023-1652

Steps To Reproduce:
1.Somehow create a view with a very long name.
2.With the view with a long name open, type, Ctrl+F7 to open the Cycle to View dialog. 
3.If the view name is too long to display on the screen then then part of the dialog are displayed off of the screen.


More information:
A screenshot of this will be attached.
Comment 1 Kevin McGuire CLA 2008-10-22 11:38:27 EDT
I'm trying to decypher the screen shot.  Is the dialog clipped off screen on the left hand side? (as well as the right?)
Comment 2 Joe Luebker CLA 2008-10-22 11:54:16 EDT
Created attachment 115826 [details]
better screenshot to help to demostrate the dialog being cutoff

I have added a new screenshot. The dialog is displayed past the edge of the application and screen on both the left and right side.
Comment 3 Kevin McGuire CLA 2008-10-22 18:12:49 EDT
Joe, is this a dupe of bug #250664?
Comment 4 Kevin McGuire CLA 2008-10-22 18:14:19 EDT
Thanks, the new screenshot is clearer (couldn't figure out in first if I was seeing your entire screen or not).
Comment 5 Joe Luebker CLA 2008-10-22 18:18:13 EDT
Yes,  250664 does appear to be a duplicate, strange. I must have done something incorrectly when filing the initial defect. Good catch, sorry about that.
Comment 6 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 16:05:42 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.