Bug 227966 - Sometimes CTRL works like F3 and jumps to the Deklaration
Summary: Sometimes CTRL works like F3 and jumps to the Deklaration
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 82904
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: IDE (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-UI-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-21 04:06 EDT by Max Milbers CLA
Modified: 2009-10-01 09:36 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Max Milbers CLA 2008-04-21 04:06:30 EDT
Probably this should be a Features. But if it is so, it is one of the most annoying features I have experienced ever.

Very often if I try Copy&Paste I am overwriting a variables declaration (or of a whole class of course).

If I have the mouse hovering over a variable, the CTRL key acts sometimes like F3. Eclipse jumps to the declaration.

example:

double myValue;
double myOldValue;

public void someClass(){
   myValue = "Something";
   myOldValue = "SomethingWrong";
}

If I selected myValue copying it using CTRL+C and doubleclick then myOldValue to select and overwrite it. If I use then CTRL+V eclipse jumps to the declaration of myOldValue and is overwriting it. Looks then like this:


double myValue;
double myValue;

public void someClass(){
   myValue = "Something";
   myOldValue = "SomethingWrong";
}

But it was intended to looks like this
double myValue;
double myOldValue;

public void someClass(){
   myValue = "Something";
   myValue = "SomethingWrong";
}

I cant believe that this is feature. I didnt customize any hotkeys. The bug is annoying me since 2 years. Every new version I hoped that it is fixed. I tried to find the bug in the database, but I wasnt able to find it.

On the othere Hand I am wondering that others seem not to have this problem.

Da Milbo
Comment 1 Remy Suen CLA 2008-04-21 07:19:57 EDT
This sounds suspiciously like bug 82904.
Comment 2 Eric Moffatt CLA 2008-04-22 10:20:07 EDT
I agree, thanks again Remy. Max, can you check against the work flows described in the referenced defect and report back?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 82904 ***