Bug 2086 - Workbench should be ready to NOT be called from eclipse.exe (1GE58U1)
Summary: Workbench should be ready to NOT be called from eclipse.exe (1GE58U1)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: All Windows 2000
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Kevin Haaland CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-10-10 22:26 EDT by Dejan Glozic CLA
Modified: 2002-02-01 13:49 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dejan Glozic CLA 2001-10-10 22:26:11 EDT
This is a warning from PDE team that PDE starts the platform by running UIMain class 
using the currently selected JVM. In other words, it is not running soon to be implemented
eclipse.exe. Consequences:

1) When PDE users start Eclipse instance to test or debug the code they are developing
in design-time Eclipse instance, they will not get anything provided by eclipse.exe.
I don't know what it is (so far I know it might be the splash screen).

2) If there is any secret handshake between eclipse.exe and the platform UI, the platform
should be ready to NOT receive when PDE launches UIMain directly. If it only 
boils down to the splashscreen, the platform should have an option to raise 
this splashscreen on its own.

I don't know about other possible consequences of PDE's running of UIMain instead
of eclipse.exe, so please fill in the blanks.


NOTES:

KH (5/22/2001 4:45:17 PM)
	
	The UI is not going to be displaying the splash screen any more. Showing the splash 
	screen is moving to eclipse.exe and product configuration level. Product.ini is also 
	moving out of the ui plugin as well.

	McQ (23/05/2001 8:46:51 AM) -
		Basically, all that eclipse.exe does is run java with a particular set of arguments.
		As long as PDE is prepared to provide those arguments, there should be no problem.
		I suggest DG talk to JMcA about what those arguments should be.
Comment 1 DJ Houghton CLA 2001-10-29 17:50:25 EST
PRODUCT VERSION:

109

Comment 2 Kevin Haaland CLA 2002-02-01 13:49:30 EST
Obsolete