Community
Participate
Working Groups
The current API suggests that the adapter implementation and the adapter type are always in the same plug-in. It is often the case that the adapter type is loaded, but the specific implementation for an adaptable is not. For these cases, the following API might make sense and avoids the Class.getName() required for every method call in client code: IAdapterManager { ... public Object loadAdapter(Object adaptable, Class adapterType); ... }
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.