Bug 198680 - [launch] Filter recent configurations using Apply Window Working Sets
Summary: [launch] Filter recent configurations using Apply Window Working Sets
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Debug (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement with 2 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-Debug-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: bugday
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-02 10:49 EDT by Neale Upstone CLA
Modified: 2016-09-07 11:43 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Neale Upstone CLA 2007-08-02 10:49:10 EDT
Build ID: I20070621-1340

Working sets are great, but... they give us rope to hang ourselves.  We run with large numbers of projects open, many of which have launch configurations which appear as favourites.

If we use the Run dialog, we get the option to "Apply Window Working Set(s)", which works perfectly.

The concept of using the Window Working Set is great, but, support for filtering in the Run/Debug/Ext Tools buttons is missing... notably missing for me.

So... can I get my favourites... or even my favorites filtered?  Please... :)

(I dare you to fix this in less than 14 hours too... ;)
Comment 1 Susan McCourt CLA 2009-07-15 12:40:18 EDT
"As per http://wiki.eclipse.org/Platform_UI/Bug_Triage_Change_2009"
Comment 2 Hitesh CLA 2009-07-16 09:14:25 EDT
Not WorkingSets.
Comment 3 Curtis Windatt CLA 2009-07-16 12:04:29 EDT
No plans to work on something like this, tagging BugDay.
Comment 4 Jonas Thedering CLA 2016-09-07 11:43:36 EDT
I don't understand why this bug is not given more priority. It really limits the usefulness of Window Working Sets.

All the other filtering settings for launch configurations (like filtering of closed projects and of specific configuration types) are also applied to the dropdown menu of the Debug/Run tool button, only "Apply Window Working Set(s)" is ignored, which is an inconsistency.