Community
Participate
Working Groups
The task view UI for priorities is clunky. - the numbers 1/2/3 for high/normal/low priority are confusing - the colours on the different numbers are gratuitous and have no intuitive meaning: - pink is used for high - gold for normal - turquoise for low - user does not know that 2 means normal, or that 3 means high; wouldn't priority one for high be more intuitive? - when you click to edit the priority, a combobox appears using the words high / normal / low - but you have to do another click, on the down arrow, to see the whole list By contrast, in MS Outlook 97, - if you double click on a task, you can change its priority in a drop-down combobox, using only the words low / normal / high - if you configure it to show the priority in the table (View / Show fields), it adds a column showing the priorities, indicated as follows: - low: a blue down arrow (more intuitive: blue for cold; down arrow for low, rather than number) - normal: blank (no clutter for regular case) - high: a red exclamation point (more intuitive: red for hot; exclamation point is standard warning sign) - if you click on the priority, a combobox appears (already dropped down, not requiring an extra click) showing Low / Normal / High, with the corresponding icons to the left of the labels, letting the user associate them better NOTES: NE (12/11/00 11:36:18 AM) Also, the column heading C for complete is non-intuitive. Why not show a check box? NE (12/11/00 11:37:01 AM) Note: Outlook has many other fields to describe a task, lets you configure which ones are visible in the task view, and even lets you add your own fields. NE (5/2/01 9:22:15 PM) Could possibly have a field editor which uses a popup menu, showing both icon and text for priorities.
PRODUCT VERSION: 036
Over to you Nick.
Obsolete PR. Priority UI has been improved.