Bug 164315 - [Change Sets] AssertionFailedException while doing update in model-based synchronization with change sets
Summary: [Change Sets] AssertionFailedException while doing update in model-based sync...
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: CVS (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: platform-cvs-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: helpwanted
: 293592 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 172027
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-11-13 09:05 EST by Markus Keller CLA
Modified: 2019-09-06 16:08 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Markus Keller CLA 2006-11-13 09:05:02 EST
I20061108-1600

Follow-up to bug 163569. In contrast to that bug, this error happened while I was doing the same steps (update in incoming mode, then switch to outgoing) in a model-based synchronization.

org.eclipse.swt.SWTException: Failed to execute runnable (org.eclipse.core.runtime.AssertionFailedException: null argument:)
at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:3407)
at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:3330)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:126)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runAsyncMessages(Display.java:3440)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3080)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:1924)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:1888)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:419)
at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.run(IDEApplication.java:95)
at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.PlatformActivator$1.run(PlatformActivator.java:78)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:74)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:348)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:165)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:341)
at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:285)
at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:987)
at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:962)
Caused by: org.eclipse.core.runtime.AssertionFailedException: null argument:
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isNotNull(Assert.java:84)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isNotNull(Assert.java:72)
at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.update(StructuredViewer.java:1904)
at org.eclipse.ui.navigator.CommonViewer.update(CommonViewer.java:428)
at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.update(StructuredViewer.java:1862)
at org.eclipse.team.internal.ccvs.ui.mappings.ChangeSetContentProvider$4.run(ChangeSetContentProvider.java:85)
at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:67)
at org.eclipse.team.internal.ui.Utils$4.run(Utils.java:760)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.RunnableLock.run(RunnableLock.java:35)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:123)
... 20 more
Comment 1 Michael Valenta CLA 2006-11-15 13:16:35 EST
Unfortunately, we don't have the manpower to address change set related issues in 3.3.
Comment 2 Steffen Pingel CLA 2010-07-09 21:50:59 EDT
*** Bug 293592 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 16:08:14 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.