Community
Participate
Working Groups
Suppose the following workspace content: RootProject project ASubProject .project Subproject2 .project ASubProject .project Subproject2 .project where ASubProject is imported from RootProject/ASubProject and Subproject2 is imported from RootProject/Subproject2. If I add a file to RootProject/ASubProject, ASubProject is automatically updated If I add a file to RootProject/Subproject2, Subproject2 is automatically updated If I add a file to ASubProject, RootProject/ASubProject is automatically updated If I add a file to Subproject2, RootProject/Subproject2 is *not* automatically updated
Tested with build i0815. I used the Core Tools to verify the contents of the resource deltas. http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/platform-core/downloads.php In the first 3 cases, the delta includes changes in both projects. In the 4th case you actually get a delta for the original creation of the resource, and then you get one for the creation of the resource in the /RootProject subfolder. Are you saying that the resource is never created in the second location or it is created later than you would expect?
(In reply to comment #1) The resource is never created in the second location.
Can you install the Core Tools (link above) and open the Delta Spy and post the results here? Thanks.
(In reply to comment #3) /[*]: {} /Subproject2[*]: {} /Subproject2/eee[+]: {}
Sorry, I should have asked for the complete output...I don't have context given what you have provided. Could you try the whole thing and post the complete deltas? thanks. Here are the steps and output that I got. Please let me know if I have done an incorrect step. Note that the final delta notification (for the creation of file2.txt in /RootProject/Subproject2) happened perhaps a second or 2 after the initial creation of the file and the first notification. 1. create project RootProject 2. create folder /RootProject/ASubProject 3. create folder /RootProject/Subproject2 4. copy /RootProject/.project to /RootProject/ASubProject/.project 5. copy /RootProject/.project to /RootProject/Subproject2/.project 6. modified the content of the .project files to contain the proper project names 7. File -> Import -> Existing project into workspace -> point to file-system location of /RootProject/ASubProject 8. File -> Import -> Existing project into workspace -> point to file-system location of /RootProject/Subproject2 9. File -> new -> File -> /ASubProject/file.txt 10. File -> New -> File -> /Subproject2/file2.txt Here is the complete delta output from the above steps: /[*]: {} /RootProject[+]: {OPEN} /RootProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/.project[*]: {CONTENT} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2/.project[*]: {CONTENT} /[*]: {} /ASubProject[+]: {OPEN} /ASubProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /Subproject2[+]: {OPEN} /Subproject2/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /ASubProject[*]: {} /ASubProject/file.txt[+]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/file.txt[+]: {} /[*]: {} /Subproject2[*]: {} /Subproject2/file2.txt[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2/file2.txt[+]: {}
Ok. The complete trace. /[*]: {} /RootProject[+]: {OPEN} /RootProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/.project[*]: {CONTENT} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2/.project[*]: {CONTENT} /[*]: {} /ASubProject[+]: {OPEN} /ASubProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /Subproject2[+]: {OPEN} /Subproject2/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /ASubProject[*]: {} /ASubProject/file.txt[+]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/file.txt[+]: {} /[*]: {} /Subproject2[*]: {} /Subproject2/file1.txt[+]: {}
Created attachment 49790 [details] Maybe the fix I think I have found the problem. AliasManager$LocationMap.overLappingResourcesDo does not take into account that there may be more than one alias for a resource. The trace with the patch: /[*]: {} /RootProject[+]: {OPEN} /RootProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/.project[*]: {CONTENT} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2/.project[*]: {CONTENT} /[*]: {} /ASubProject[+]: {OPEN} /ASubProject/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /Subproject2[+]: {OPEN} /Subproject2/.project[+]: {} /[*]: {} /ASubProject[*]: {} /ASubProject/file.txt[+]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject[*]: {} /RootProject/ASubProject/file.txt[+]: {} /[*]: {} /RootProject[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2[*]: {} /RootProject/Subproject2/file1.txt[+]: {} /Subproject2[*]: {} /Subproject2/file1.txt[+]: {}
Cool, thanks. Did you do the same steps that I did or something a little different? The component ower for this code is on vacation but will be back in the next week or so and can look at the patch at that point. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #8) If I did not make an error, I used the same steps as you.
Created attachment 52629 [details] Updated patch Updated patch - same solution but with cleaner code and comments. Manklu: How should we record you in the copyright statement for this file (name or company)?
Fix released. Thanks again for the test case and patch!
(In reply to comment #10) > Manklu: How should we record you in the copyright statement for this file (name > or company)? It's okay if you use the E-Mail address. A last question. Will this change be backported to 3.2?
