Bug 144460 - JUnit tests fail when ordering of methods reversed
Summary: JUnit tests fail when ordering of methods reversed
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Runtime (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: platform-runtime-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 142528
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-05-30 10:55 EDT by Sonia Dimitrov CLA
Modified: 2006-06-09 09:17 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
JUnit results (3.2RC6) (48.04 KB, text/html)
2006-05-30 10:55 EDT, Sonia Dimitrov CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sonia Dimitrov CLA 2006-05-30 10:55:25 EDT 
Per bug 142528 comment 3, this report is being open to indicate that there are
failures in the runtime tests when the test methods are added in reverse order
(see bug 142528 comment 1).

Attachment to follow with results.
Comment 1 Sonia Dimitrov CLA 2006-05-30 10:55:53 EDT 
Created attachment 42966 [details]
JUnit results (3.2RC6)
Comment 2 DJ Houghton CLA 2006-05-30 11:23:35 EDT 
This failure looks unrelated to the test re-ordering.
Comment 3 John Arthorne CLA 2006-06-08 16:11:20 EDT 
Thomas, I cannot reproduce this failure by reversing the order of the tests.  Is this consistently reproducible for you?  These tests have been known to experience non-reproducible sporadic failures due to their concurrent nature.  Knowing if you can reproduce it consistently would be useful.  Also, does it fail if you just rung JobTest by itself, or does it only fail when run as part of a larger suite?
Comment 4 Thomas Hallgren CLA 2006-06-08 17:29:16 EDT 
No, this one is sporadic and probably not related to test ordering at all. I thought it was initially since the first time it showed up was when I changed the order. Sorry about that. Now I don't seem to be able to reproduce it at all.
Comment 5 John Arthorne CLA 2006-06-09 09:17:47 EDT 
Ok, thanks.  Please reopen if you find a reproducible failure.