Bug 113455 - [Markers] Some error markers do not appear
Summary: [Markers] Some error markers do not appear
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux-GTK
: P2 blocker (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.2 RC1   Edit
Assignee: Tod Creasey CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: polish
: 83168 101367 116623 127549 128949 128951 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 113582
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-10-22 11:32 EDT by Douglas Pollock CLA
Modified: 2006-04-26 07:55 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Douglas Pollock CLA 2005-10-22 11:32:26 EDT
I20051018-0800, GTK+ 2.6.8, KDE 3.4.1, X.org 6.8.2, Linux 2.6.13  
  
+ When I saw Bug 113454, I started up Eclipse and synchronized with HEAD.   
Even with all the code from HEAD, no errors showed up in my Problems view.   
+ So, I opened the file referenced in the first compile error  
(ResourceMappingMarkersTest), and it had several errors in it.  
+ I clicked on one of the methods that was an error  
(problemView.getCurrentMarkers()), and hit "F3".  Now one error appears in the  
Problems view: "ModelProvider cannot be resolved" in CompositeResourceMapping.  
+ I tried cleaning all projects, to see if that would motivate the errors to  
appear.  The one error that was there previously then disappeared.  
 
I had a hard time deciding whether to make this "blocker" or "major".  The big 
problem, as I see it, is that this can lead to broken builds (as we've seen).  
So I marked it as a blocker.
Comment 1 John Arthorne CLA 2005-10-24 09:29:19 EDT
Michael V (not M) was seeing this on Friday - not sure if he logged a different
bug.  He had the problems view in a completely inconsistent state where it
didn't reflect the errors in the classes of his workspace. Also, the status line
at the top of the problems view did not always match the rest of the view... for
example it would say "Filter matched 0 of xxxx" items", but there would be
several problems in the table.  There has been no change to the underlying
marker infrastructure in 3.1 at all, so it looks like a problems view problem.
Comment 2 Tod Creasey CLA 2005-10-24 16:34:43 EDT
I think this is a dup of Bug 113582 but I am going to leave it open until we are
sure.
Comment 3 Douglas Pollock CLA 2005-10-28 16:56:30 EDT
This problem is still occurring for me in I20051025-0800.   Either Bug 113582 
is not related or it is not fixed. 
 
Comment 4 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-01-24 15:00:53 EST
Doug are you still seeing this (it has been 3 months)?
Comment 5 Douglas Pollock CLA 2006-01-24 15:08:03 EST
I have still seen this from time to time, though it is decidedly less frequent.
Comment 6 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-02-03 09:34:15 EST
I have found a replicatable case 

1) Import Ant Core from existing plug-ins 
2) Open the class AntBuildfileContentDescriber
3) Remove the import that has the access warning

About half of the time your markers will not update with the errors you need (and vice versa when you add it back). 
Comment 7 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-02-03 09:52:17 EST
I have released a fix for the problem below in build >20060203. I am not going to close this bug yet because Doug reported it before the code I just changed was written so there may be other issues as well.
Comment 8 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-02-27 10:54:17 EST
*** Bug 128949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-03-02 14:52:29 EST
I found some more holes in the update story which I have fixed in build >20060402 by removing some flags, locks and unneccessary work (this will also give some performance improvements as well)
Comment 10 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-03-03 14:06:54 EST
*** Bug 128951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-03-22 09:59:16 EST
Note that pre 20060303 the updates would have periodically have stopeed because of Bug 132838. We now have code that protects against this issue.
Comment 12 Michael Van Meekeren CLA 2006-04-06 14:31:02 EDT
Is this fixed then?  What's the plan for 3.2?
Comment 13 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-04-06 14:37:15 EDT
Yes. It was fixed in M6 with the fixes to update if there is no post update.
Comment 14 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-04-07 12:46:00 EDT
*** Bug 83168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-04-07 14:37:15 EDT
*** Bug 101367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-04-07 16:04:04 EDT
*** Bug 116623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-04-07 16:38:25 EDT
*** Bug 127549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Tod Creasey CLA 2006-04-26 07:55:45 EDT
Verified in 20050425