Bug 106282 - [EditorMgmt] tabs: Order editors alphabetically
Summary: [EditorMgmt] tabs: Order editors alphabetically
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform UI Triaged CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-06 12:00 EDT by Don Leckie CLA
Modified: 2019-09-06 16:14 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
Screenshot of discrepency in sorting (58.86 KB, image/gif)
2006-04-21 12:01 EDT, Chris Adams CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Don Leckie CLA 2005-08-06 12:00:18 EDT
Keep the editors in alphabetical order so that scanning the tabs will be 
faster to find the desired editor.  Also, the drop down list at the right end 
of the editor tabs would be better alphabetized.

The alphabetized editor tabs should be the most be the latest viewed editors.

I usually have 10-20 editors open because I'm working on several source code 
files.  It's time consuming searching for a specific editor.

I'm using a 20" monitor, so I can see many editor tabs.

I've just switched from JBuilder where the editor tabs are alphabetized and 
stacked into rows.  That made it very fast to switch editors --- one mouse 
click.
Comment 1 Chris Adams CLA 2006-04-21 12:01:25 EDT
Created attachment 39178 [details]
Screenshot of discrepency in sorting
Comment 2 Chris Adams CLA 2006-04-21 12:04:08 EDT
Comment on attachment 39178 [details]
Screenshot of discrepency in sorting

Attached to wrong bug #
Comment 3 Michael Van Meekeren CLA 2006-04-21 13:19:38 EDT
Moving Dougs bugs
Comment 4 Susan McCourt CLA 2009-07-09 19:07:54 EDT
As per http://wiki.eclipse.org/Platform_UI/Bug_Triage_Change_2009
Comment 5 Boris Bokowski CLA 2009-11-17 13:04:02 EST
Remy is now responsible for watching the [EditorMgmt] component area.
Comment 6 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 16:14:17 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.