| Re: [science-iwg] Eclipse vs. GitHub Code Hosting |
Hi Matt, hi Jonah,
thanks for your insights :-).
Best,
Philip
Am 28.11.2016 um 10:42 schrieb Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Hi Philip,
We use gerrit/Jenkins/Buckminster (locally hosted) for our main build and github/Travis/Tycho (github+travis) for some of the open source projects, two of which are eclipse ones.
There is not much to choose between them functionally. The remote solution has been more volatile in terms of speed, in the morning it is much faster and the afternoon much slower.
It seems github has cleaned up on the hosted repositories scene recently. It is the way the industry has gone. This of course means that new computer graduates will be recommending something else and funky and those about to retire will be complaining about how it used to be in the good old days of [insert trusted old repository here]... I say this from the point of view of someone that has only just learned to rebase.
All the best,
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: science-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxg [mailto:science-iwg-bounces@eclipse.org ] On Behalf Of Jonah Graham
Sent: 27 November 2016 13:04
To: Science Industry Working Group
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Eclipse vs. GitHub Code Hosting
Hi,
This issue has been discussed in the wider community before, there may be valuable insight there:
https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-committers ./msg01095.html
In addition to the committers mailing list the incubation one has also had this conversation a bit.
* Which experience do you have using pull requests? Is it easier than Gerrit?
Easier to get started with PRs, but Gerrit is better for reviewing and gives much better history in the long run. Therefore as an occasional contributor to another project I would prefer they used GitHub PRs, but as a regular contributor and as a maintainer I would prefer Gerrit.
* How do you ensure that people have signed the Eclipse CLA?
Part of validation checks done automatically for all github.com/eclipse projects: e.g.
https://github.com/eclipse/january/pull/23 has a link in it to
https://dev.eclipse.org/eclipse-webhook/services/status_ details.php?id=582d773bbd853
* Does anyone use Travis CI to build the code?
DAWNSci does, and it is on my todo list for January
* If yes, does Travis CI support Maven/Tycho? I read, that Maven is supported, hence I assume Tycho works as well.
Travis most certainly does.
* How do you sign the plugins?
You can't. You need to use Hudson for that. Other projects use Travis for PR builds and Hudson for release builds.
* Which ticket/bug tracker do you use when hosting the code at GitHub (Bugzilla, GitHub Issues)?
January uses GitHub issues. Most projects seem to use the GitHub issues if they use GitHub for code.
* I also saw that Eclipse promotes Tuleap now. Will it work together with code hosted on GitHub?
Don't know on this one.
Thanks
Jonah
~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders Ltd.
www.kichwacoders.com
On 27 November 2016 at 12:27, Philip Wenig <philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi folks,______________________________
my experience is, that contributors have several problems using Gerrit
correctly (me too at the beginning). I saw that a lot of Eclipse
projects are hosting their code at GitHub. Furthermore, I would like
to integrate ChemClipse into a continuous build system, based on
Maven/Tycho. Hence, I have the following questions?
* Which experience do you have using pull requests? Is it easier than
Gerrit?
* How do you ensure that people have signed the Eclipse CLA?
* Does anyone use Travis CI to build the code?
* If yes, does Travis CI support Maven/Tycho? I read, that Maven is
supported, hence I assume Tycho works as well.
* How do you sign the plugins?
* Which ticket/bug tracker do you use when hosting the code at GitHub
(Bugzilla, GitHub Issues)?
* I also saw that Eclipse promotes Tuleap now. Will it work together
with code hosted on GitHub?
I know, tons of questions. It would be great to get some feedback so
that I can make a good decision which way to go with ChemClipse.
Thanks in advance!
Philip
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OpenChrom - the open source alternative for chromatography / mass
spectrometry Dr. Philip Wenig » Founder » philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx »
http://www.openchrom.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
_________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OpenChrom - the open source alternative for chromatography / mass spectrometry
Dr. Philip Wenig » Founder » philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx » http://www.openchrom.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg