| Re: [science-iwg] Unconference at ECE |
Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
science-iwg-request@eclipse.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Press Release for Science Simultaneous Release
(Jay Jay Billings)
2. Unconference at ECE (UOMo)
3. Re: Unconference at ECE (Ian Mayo)
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:24:09 +0100
From: Ian Mayo <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Science Industry Working Group <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Unconference at ECE
Message-ID:
<CAHWjJFbUV6DtWKiE-zpW3p73-A65Fp4p0c5rAZqpZMZGrWnP-Q@ >mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Werner,
I know the January numeric library intends to add support for physical
and mathematical units [1]
I wonder if there is an opportunity for interested parties to
brain-storm a way ahead for integrating JSR 363 into January. Once a
route is agreed I'd be quite happy to contribute effort to the
implementation.
Regards,
Ian
[1]. https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/january
On 30 September 2016 at 15:15, UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw topics are filling up quite nicely for the Science WG Unconference.
> I spoke to STEM contributors during the last conf call (another one is in a
> week) and Chris from BFR said he might say something on STEM, but was hoping
> he could also get a ticket for the whole conference week. Maybe he has to
> check with his boss or institute about that.
>
> Timeslot 4 is still pretty empty, so I wanted to know, if there's interest
> in a quick session and live demo on how migration from (rejected) JSR 275
> could work to the new final and official JSR 363?
>
> Both LocationTech and Science projects (e.g. DawnSci) are known users of JSR
> 275 either directly, via JScience or GeoAPI. Some of these or e.g. Apache
> SIS drove download numbers of 275 to extraordinary figures in recent months:
> https://bintray.com/keilw/maven/javax.measure%3Ajsr-275# statistics
>
> On average between 600 and 700 per day. We hope, that's still not a reason
> for Oracle to sue any project or product using it (the Spec License for JSRs
> seems quite clear, that everyone probably should have destroyed it when 275
> was rejected in 2010;-)
>
> The biggest user, GeoAPI is about to upgrade to Java 7 and with it plans a
> vote on upgrading to JSR 363 with a new release. SmartHome has asked to
> include JSR 363 into Orbit. While IP processing can be very slow as you
> heard, at some point in the next couple of months that shall work.
> At least when the new GeoAPI version is released, LocationTech will want to
> use it and with it JSR 363 is inevitable, otherwise they have to stick with
> existing GeoAPI.
>
> I'm happy to give a quick "live hacking" demo of how to migrate from one to
> the other.
> Would that be of interest for the Unconference?
>
> Talking later in the day is not so bad, I come by train from Frankfurt and
> plan to return the same night, so I don't need a hotel in Ludwigsburg.
>
> CU,
> Werner
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
--
Ian Mayo
Deep Blue C Technology Ltd
- New technologies, implemented well
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 44, Issue 30
*******************************************