| Re: [science-iwg] travis+eclipse project |
Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20 (UOMo)
2. travis+eclipse project (Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
3. Re: travis+eclipse project (Torkild Ulv?y Resheim)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:02:00 +0200
From: UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
Message-ID:
<CAAGawe0GgeCFTZc-AWOswroHbWRSx4LjbrohPGHSDRn8Y420dA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Ok, but as mentioned there should be a Science TLP to complement this WG
soon, so that means, if approved future project proposals like
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.january
may look along the lines of
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/science.january (hypothetical URL;-)
Would any project like January, BioClipse or others have the option to
switch like we saw e.g. Mylyn and others did from Technology to Tools,
Runtime etc.?
Mylyn from what I remember never changed the URL (except maybe when it was
renamed from "Mylar") so it seems likely existing projects may change a TLP
without changing or losing the project URL. That's among STEM's desires to
keep, otherwise especially visibility in the scientific world would be
welcome by the STEM project.
Though the project lead at IBM is based in the US, there are several key
committers in Berlin, so should it be of interest to meet with Mike while
he's likely in town next month, Matthias and others at BfR (see
http://wiki.eclipse.org/The_STEM_Development_Team) would be happy to have a
chat if there's time.
Werner
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:05 AM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20 (UOMo)
> 2. Re: science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20 (Mike Milinkovich)
> 3. Re: science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20 (Jay Jay Billings)
> 4. Re: EclipseCon France - Workflows, workflows & more
> (Jay Jay Billings)
> 5. Re: EclipseCon France - Workflows, workflows & more (Andrea Ross)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:28:49 +0200
> From: UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [science-iwg] science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
> Message-ID:
> <CAAGawe2z-8tPHSfRLFem9Fyj4pZQnD9=
> rJpKZfe4VbdodaNoLA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> That would be good to know. I only plan to attend Unconference day (as none
> of the 2 sessions related to Automotive myself and another colleague from
> the same team proposed are in the main conference program and May also has
> a tremendous amount of holidays in Germany, so losing a whole week in June
> would not be good either) but at least the Automotive WG F2F on that day is
> also of interest to me. If there are agenda proposals for Science, I'd be
> happy to say something about STEM given its new release in June and a
> prospect of moving closer to Science especially if the IWG was to turn into
> a full top level project like "Tools" or "Technology".
>
> Cheers,
> Werner
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:00 PM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
> > science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: EclipseCon France - Workflows, workflows & more
> > (Christian Pontesegger)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:11:23 +0200
> > From: Christian Pontesegger <christian.pontesegger@xxxxxx>
> > To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [science-iwg] EclipseCon France - Workflows, workflows &
> > more
> > Message-ID: <5715072B.4080108@xxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > plans regarding the unconference would be great. Is there already a
> > timeslot assigned for the friday session? Would be great to know for
> > travel planning.
> >
> > cheers
> > Christian
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > science-iwg mailing list
> > science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> > from this list, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
> >
> > End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
> > *******************************************
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/attachments/20160419/d261e5e6/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:01:40 -0400
> From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [science-iwg] science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
> Message-ID: <57166474.5030504@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> On 4/19/2016 12:28 PM, UOMo wrote:
> > ...especially if the IWG was to turn into a full top level project
> > like "Tools" or "Technology".
>
> It is not correct to think of this as the IWG turning into a top-level
> project. A WG and a TLP are complementary.
>
> The charter for the Science Top-Level Project will hopefully be approved
> by the Eclipse Foundation Board of Directors on tomorrow's conference call.
>
> --
> Mike Milinkovich
> mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
> +1.613.220.3223 (mobile)
> @mmilinkov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/attachments/20160420/c0eb72bd/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:05:10 +0000
From: <Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [science-iwg] travis+eclipse project
Message-ID:
<14159819E27EDC41968035052B165F669AF94A76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
These are a list of the eclipse travis builds, https://travis-ci.org/eclipse. We have been using travis for dawnsci, richbeans and our prototype scanning project (which is on https://travis-ci.org/DiamondLightSource) for a while.
Is this ok / a good idea for eclipse projects? Any issues with not using the standard Jenkins approach like Triquetrum does? Perhaps permission has to be asked from the bureaucracy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoRoaNVho54
Thanks a mill.
Matt
--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/attachments/20160420/ac285348/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:22:35 +0200
From: Torkild Ulv?y Resheim <torkildr@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Science Industry Working Group <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] travis+eclipse project
Message-ID: <818550C7-7B37-45CB-BC7D-B45BA6E5164F@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Matt,
I?m pretty sure that there are no limitations on what build technology or service you use. Travis-CI should be perfectly good. Of course you don?t get the integration with Gerrit and Bugzilla, but as long as your?re happy with what GitHub offers you should not have to do any changes in the stack. There is a discussion on the pros and cons of using GitHub here https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-committers/msg01095.html
Best regards,
Torkild
> 20. apr. 2016 kl. 18.05 skrev <Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hello,
>
> These are a list of the eclipse travis builds, https://travis-ci.org/eclipse. We have been using travis for dawnsci, richbeans and our prototype scanning project (which is on https://travis-ci.org/DiamondLightSource) for a while.
>
> Is this ok / a good idea for eclipse projects? Any issues with not using the standard Jenkins approach like Triquetrum does? Perhaps permission has to be asked from the bureaucracy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoRoaNVho54
>
> Thanks a mill.
>
> Matt
>
> --
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 23
*******************************************