Re: [science-iwg] January - New Eclipse Project Proposal

[Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jonah,

This is great news! Awesome!

My first concern is that during our previous discussion about this both at ECE, on the list, and during the SC call a couple of months ago we concluded that it was best to include ICE's data structures as part of the initial contribution. From the proposal it looks like you want to deliver an IC and then come back around to EAVP and ICE. I think that is the correct approach for EAVP, but I think ICE's data structures should be part of the IC. They are ready to go and can just be dropped in.

My second concern is that the project has only two committers, you and Peter. I think there are other people in the group that would have justifiable roles in this (Matt, Baha, etc.) and it is better to list them now. If you list them now then they will not have to be elected later.

Both of these concerns boil down to getting as much of the community involved as soon as possible. I think that is really important for all the science projects.

I'll copy this into a comment on the proposal.

Jay

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear all,

Peter and I are pleased to announce that the January project proposal
(https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/january) has now gone live.

We are now soliciting community feedback so that we can progress the
proposal to the creation review.

We have written a short blog post
(http://kichwacoders.com/2016/01/26/introducing-project-january/) with
some background on naming too.

Best Regards,
Jonah

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders Ltd.
www.kichwacoders.com
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

--

Jay Jay Billings

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings