I would also like to add Triquetrum as
interested party/project.
This might add a slightly different use-case for the data
structures, compared to the other mentioned projects that are
often building scientific workbenches.
For Triquetrum, we should be able to run big loads of "head-less"
workflows in different runtimes (workbench, web servers, batch
systems, ...).
E.g. we would need to be able to support some kind of lightweight
"URIs" or other kinds of references to data items, subsets,
slices, ... within multiple datasets.
Such URIs may need to be passed between workflow actions,
serialized and sent around on a cluster etc.
(there is/was some specific support for this in DAWN's dataset API
during a pilot project with Passerelle workflows some time ago, to
identify slices)
It would also be required that the data structure implementations
can be used in non-eclipse applications (but still OSGi).
E.g. the implementation should not assume the presence of
workspaces, projects etc and other things that may seem natural
when using the eclipse resources APIs.
And I'm sure we will discover other pecularities ;-)
cheers
erwin
Op 11/12/2015 om 15:48 schreef Tracy Miranda:
Jay,
Great, thanks for the update, especially clarity on the scope of
the project.
Peter, Jonah & I were just discussing the project
proposal on Wednesday. Jonah will go ahead and create it and
distribute for feedback from the science working group. We
will liase with all parties who have expressed interest to
ensure this is captured in the proposal, committer list, etc.
(So far this list looks like Oakridge/ICE, Diamond/DAWN, EAVP,
Marintek, Werner/UOMo). Please let me know if I've forgotten
anyone, or if you want to be on the proposal.
Regards,
Tracy
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
|