| Re: [science-iwg] Project recommendations |
FWIW, that is essentially why ORNL's default OSS license is New BSD.
Jay
On 08/04/2015 11:57 AM, Philip Wenig wrote:
I already spoke with Christoph and Egon. They are willing to dual-license the CDK under the LGPL and MIT or BSD license. Nonetheless, the best would be if they could also join the Science WG :-).
I have to be honest: I am not sure that I could get the Eclipse Board to agree to an LGPL-licensed project at Eclipse, even if it is dual-licensed with MIT or BSD. It is not completely out of the question, but it would most certainly be a significant risk.
Would EPL+BSD be an option? I am not a lawyer, but I cannot think of a scenario where that combination would harm the existing adopters. Anyone using the code from the (L)GPL world would continue to do so under the BSD.
--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg