| Re: [science-iwg] ChemClipse proposal |
Very good Philip! I left a comment:
I strongly support this project and recommend that it be accepted. It will make a fine addition to the Science Working Group.
I have two small suggestions. First, you should search Nebula and Orbit to see how many of your dependencies are already available. For example, SWT XY GRAPH is in Nebula and many Apache Commons packages are in Orbit. Doing this will reduce the amount of time that the IP team needs to review your initial contribution and help you hit your proposed release schedule.
Second, how does this project interact with other projects? For example, are you collaborating with DAWNSci in some way? This information isn't required, but it would be good to see so that we can track collaborations and reuse.
Jay
Hi folks,
the community review for the ChemClipse proposal has been opened today:
http://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/chemclipse
I'm looking forward to go through the process :-).
Best,
Philip
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Philip Wenig
http://www.openchrom.net
https://www.xing.com/profile/Philip_Wenig
http://de.linkedin.com/pub/philip-wenig/2a/4a8/877
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg