Hi, I am on this list as well. Feel free to ask any Sapphire questions you might have. > I would bet on Sapphire. AFAIK, it was designed for XML-based descriptors > (like the Java EE XML descriptors), but perhaps it evolved over the years to > support also JSON-based descriptors like composer.json. Sapphire has a general-purpose resource system that sits beneath the model and handles reading/writing properties. The framework ships currently with a basic memory resource and an XML resource that uses annotations to control how to bind model properties to XML DOM. Adopters have implemented custom resources for various scenarios. JSON support would, of course, be very useful in a wide variety of applications. The primary blocker for this has been the lack of a decent JSON source editor, but that’s about to change. If you guys decide to go forward with Sapphire, I’d be interested in partnering with you on adding generic JSON support to the framework, which you would then leverage to build the composer editor. Thanks, - Konstantin From: Kaloyan Raev Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 2:41 AM To: PDT Developers Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Ambitious composer plans
Hi Thomas, I would bet on Sapphire. AFAIK, it was designed for XML-based descriptors (like the Java EE XML descriptors), but perhaps it evolved over the years to support also JSON-based descriptors like composer.json. I would recommend that you first describe the Composer use case in the Sapphire forum and ask for guidance how to start modeling it. Most probably, it will be again Konstantin that will answer you - he is leading the Sapphire project. On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Thomas Gossmann <eclipse@xxxxxx> wrote: Hi guys,
I send a mail to ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx [1] and get an answer [2]. Konstantin was so kind to point me to three eclipse projects. I roughly scanned through them.
Scout: Might not be for us, looks more like web-technics EFF: This might be a place to contribute my code Sapphire: This is a totally different approach and I really like it. I'd rather look into this than contributing code (I haven't tried it out yet).
Would like to get your opinions about it - maybe you even know about other alternatives.
[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ide-dev/msg00885.html [2] https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ide-dev/msg00886.html
gossi
Am 09.10.15 um 11:45 schrieb Kaloyan Raev: Hi Gossi,
Regarding this: > 2. Eclipse components: That's to sort out were to put them, then port them to e4 and put them at their desired location (whom to talk to?)
I suggest that you write to the ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> mailing list. Describe what you have in your project and ask which Eclipse project is the best target for contribution.
Greetings, Kaloyan
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Thomas Gossmann <eclipse@xxxxxx <mailto:eclipse@xxxxxx>> wrote:
Guys,
I need to catch up on a couple of things here, I guess:
1) A plan sounds great. This would require a greater strategy than we thought at first (see below).
2) PEX Composer + Zend Composer = PDT Composer: I love this merge. I can only judge Zend Composer from screenshots, so I think from the UI perspective and with composer java bindings, this is were PEX composer shines, when it comes to provide APIs to other tools, there is nothing PEX composer can offer, so the zend composer APIs would be a great addition (I just assume there are some, based on what Michal said).
3) Dependencies: There are a lot of dependencies involved, though not all of them need to be reused as there might be newer alternatives available. I'll quickly go through them for PEX composer (I summarize them as "The Challenges" in my blog post): - Composer Java Bindings: They were mainly written by me, however they depend on "json-simple", both of them needs to be made available to eclipse - that's where you guys know how to do that. Maybe it also makes sense to include the bindings into eclipse as well. - JSON-Editor: Using the new json editor for wtp is the way to go here (see my planning below) - Eclipse elements/widgets: That's what I extracted from the PDE-Editor and reused it first in the composer plugin and then extracted it into its own lib: https://github.com/gossi/eclipse-components which should be ported to e4 and then made available to eclipse - Running CLI-Tools: That's a very tricky part and I explained a lot about this in the blog post. As this is not only a task for composer but also for npm/bower/all the other cli tools you use nowadays you might run from eclipse. We should reach out and create a solid API within the WTP or DLTK? E.g. the npm/bower editor might also have a similar editor to composer someday, with install/update actions on top.
4) Planning: (I need to make a personal note here: I am currently taking my final university exams (one more to go) and afterwards will be working for 6 months on my thesis as you can imagine I won't be of that much help during that time) Nevertheless, the code for the composer related stuff is ready to port, yet it's about the dependencies. The first step would be to sort this out and work on them first.
A) Dependencies: 1. JSON-Editor will be around for neon. We are in no time pressure or hurry, I expect the other dependencies to be ready at this time as well. 2. Eclipse components: That's to sort out were to put them, then port them to e4 and put them at their desired location (whom to talk to?) 3. Cli-Tools: Reach out for the npm/bower guys, talk with them and work on the foundation for that. 4. Manage all IP/CQ, whatever needs to be done.
Dependencies should be ready and shipped with neon.
B) Composer: Now that everything is sorted out, the composer codebases can be merged into PDT, creating nice APIs, etc.
PS. Maybe create a wiki page with a plan and items that are todo?
gossi
Am 09.10.15 um 08:59 schrieb Michał Niewrzał:
Maybe we should resurrect pdt.incubator ?
+1
BTW, I also think that at least two most active commiters should be invited to PDT team.
Sounds good to me.
Greetings, Michal
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Dawid Pakuła <zulus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
Hi,
Plan looks good. Gossi? Problem are not library dependencies. Composer plugin use code from other projects: 1. Provide metadata for class/interface wizard, so probably should be moved to PDT 2. Require E4, fortunately we decide to keep api compatibility with previous eclipse release only 3. Use JSON editor from outside eclipse, JSON-WTP is still in CQ phase 4. Is based on Robert Composer Java Bindings. This library probably also should be moved to PDT and released in eclipse maven repository.
Maybe we should resurrect pdt.incubator ?
BTW, I also think that at least two most active commiters should be invited to PDT team.
-- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064 <tel:%2B48%20795%20996%20064> <tel:%2B48%20795%20996%20064>
On 7 October 2015 at 08:12:15, Kaloyan Raev (kaloyan.r@xxxxxxxx <mailto:kaloyan.r@xxxxxxxx> <mailto:kaloyan.r@xxxxxxxx <mailto:kaloyan.r@xxxxxxxx>>) wrote:
Hi,
I think we need to build a plan and start executing it. How about this:
1. Open CQs with code contributions to PDT. This may be quite a heavy step. As far as I understand, the PEX Composer has a lot of dependencies. We need to clarify what gets contributed to PDT and what is removed as dependency. We (Zend) can also contribute via CQ our Composer plugin from Zend Studio. Once we have the code of both PEX and Zend Composer plugins under EPL and IP-verified we can start thinking how to merge them in the ultimate PDT Composer plugin.
2. Agree and implement a common Core API part for both PEX Composer and Zend Composer plugins. The goal is that we have all plugins depending on Composer (like the Symfony plugin from PEX and the Apigility plugin from Zend Studio) to use a common Composer Core API.
3. Start merging the UI.
What do you think?
Kaloyan
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Dawid Pakuła <zulus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
Hi,
I want refresh this topic because we are in post 3.6.
Would be good to start IP cleanup process. -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064 <tel:%2B48%20795%20996%20064> <tel:%2B48%20795%20996%20064>
On 22 September 2015 at 15:02:26, Dawid Pakuła (zulus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:zulus@xxxxxxxxx>>) wrote:
HI,
Thanks for that!
Two comment from me for now: 1. JSON: On JSDT gerrit pending WTP-based JSON editor [1][2] I hope it will be merged in Neon (together with bower support) 2. Namespace support: I opened bug to add class loader metadata into build path [3]. Composer / puli or any other plugin can provide such information.
[1] - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471820 [2] - https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/51516/ [3] - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=472758
-- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064 <tel:%2B48%20795%20996%20064> <tel:%2B48%20795%20996%20064>
On 22 September 2015 at 14:50:02, Thomas Gossmann (eclipse@xxxxxx <mailto:eclipse@xxxxxx> <mailto:eclipse@xxxxxx <mailto:eclipse@xxxxxx>>) wrote:
Hey guys,
I write a blog post about the composer plans [1] that Robert and me discovered when we initially created the plugin and also talks about merging this into PDT. So, despite having the idea of merging composer into PDT, it is much more interessting to get the original idea of the composer plugin. Especially since it has a lot potential for PDT.
I unfortunately had to cancel the GSOC project even before it was submitted. Yet next summer still may be an opportunity for this (depending on how fast I finish).
Nevertheless, merging composer into PDT is a huge effort and there are a lot of challenges ahead (which I address in my post). It is also way more than just refactoring the appropriate package names. I assume the workload for one person to be 3 month (likely higher).
This thread should be used to think about the options we have, what needs to be prepared (and how) and probably create a strategy merging this.
[1] http://gos.si/blog/pdt-and-composer-a-visionary-concept
gossi _______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
|