Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [iot-wg] IoT Developer Survey 2016
Here are some more data models:

IPSO Smart Objects

OIC Resource Type Specification

W3C Web of Things Interest Group

On that subject, I’d like to remind everyone about the IAB sponsored workshop on IoT Semantic Interoperability coming up in March.


SL: "After we are able to exchange messages between Things and applications via communication protocols, how to "understand and use" the messages from the Things in an interoperable fashion will become more and more important.”

Personally, I believe that hypermedia and the HATEOAS design style is our best hope for accommodating the diversity of data models, interaction models, and serializations that we are bound to deal with in the coming age of connected things. 


I’m building a demonstration of an IoT system using HATEOAS based on a reference implementation of the Hypermedia Collection interface described in IETF CoRE Interfaces:


Cheers,

Michael

On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Steve Liang <steve.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Ian,

Can we ask developers about the IoT data model/API standards they are using (or expect to use)?  After we are able to exchange messages between Things and applications via communication protocols, how to "understand and use" the messages from the Things in an interoperable fashion will become more and more important.

For example:

- What data model and web API standards do you use for your IoT solution?  (Multiple selection)
  • ISO 19156 Observation and Measurement
  • OGC Sensor Web Enablement
  • OGC SensorThings API
  • OneM2M
  • UCUM (The unified code for unit of measure)
  • W3C JSON-LD
  • W3C RDF
  • W3C SSN (Semantic Sensor Networks)
  • ... more here?
  • Our own proprietary data model
My two cents. 

Cheers,
Steve



On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Ian Skerrett <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,

Happy New Year. I am looking forward to another great year for the Eclipse IoT Working Group.

One of the initiatives I'd like to kick-off in Q1 is the IoT Developer Survey. We ran this survey last year and it proved to be a valuable resource to the community. As a reminder, here is the report from 2015. http://www.slideshare.net/IanSkerrett/iot-developer-survey-2015

To kick-off the initiative, we need to agree to a set of questions. Attached are the questions we used from last year. I'd like to recommend we use these questions as the starting point for the 2016 survey.

Please let me know if you would like to help design the survey questions. I'd like to get 2-3 people who would agree to provide feedback/input to the questions.

Thanks
Ian

--

Ian Skerrett
VP of Marketing
Eclipse Foundation
(m) 613-240-7210
(o) 613-224-9461 ext 227
(t) @ianskerrett


_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg



--
Dr. Steve Liang, Ph.D., P.Eng.
CEO
SensorUp Inc.
#122 3553 31st NW, Calgary
Alberta, Canada - T2L 2K7
(403) 510-8996 
@steveliang 

_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg

Back to the top