[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Did I mess up our procedure for Neon? With respect to declaring, and enablement, and our "list of participants"?

Hi,

 

I see Memory Analyzer is now in the list. However, it is listed with a +0 offset, which is wrong. The offset should be +3

 

Regards,

Krum

 

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 16:01
To: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Did I mess up our procedure for Neon? With respect to declaring, and enablement, and our "list of participants"?

 

Just today I realized I think I was supposed to "disable" everyone, until they responded affirmatively that they were participating in Neon.

Since so many have declared their intent already, I hate to start over, by disabling everyone, but, need to come up with a list of "those who have declared intent",
and then I will disable the rest.

Wayne have you been keeping track? So far, the list at
https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/neon
only shows "Eclipse" is participating. I assume that's set to always be true. :)
But the rest need someone to enter the data?

If we can get a better list in next week or so, then by M3 I will disable anyone who has not yet declared intent.
For example, perhaps BIRT is no longer planning to participate? (For all I know?)

Thanks,