Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
Sounds rude? You can
get engaged via your PMC's, and it's likely more efficient than
discussing this over and over by E-Mail.
That's just it. I can't engage because I honestly don't have the time.
I would like to engage more in the discussion about release train rules
because I feel that my motivation is affected in a negative way when
the number of rules increase, seemingly without benefit to my projects
community. There are a lot of other things that I would like to engage
in too but where I have to pass for the same reason. Why do our lawyers
disapprove LGPL in some cases and approve it in others? I'd like to
help fixing issues regarding SVN commit statistics, etc.
But, as I said, there's no time for that. Instead I do what I can to
focus my time on providing benefit for the Buckminster community. A
community where none of the new must-dos ever came up in a discussion
before they suddenly appeared in our bugzilla. Now they require our
attention, big-time. I wish the PMC could have trusted us to provide a
good enough tool without additional rules. After all, our community
will pass a harsh judgment if that's not the case anyway. It's their
requirements we ought to fulfill and that should be our top priority.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
|