Re: [andmore-dev] Bug 525493 - Projects containing aar libraries current

[Matthew Piggott <misc@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I was actually meaning this branch on my fork of Andmore - https://github.com/mpiggott/andmore/compare/6deb879ed0dc697bcf4b6a698cd21e3a3f7a55c3...android-n.1?expand=1

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Carver, David <kingargyle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sounds good.  If you run into any issues, post back here.

Thanks.

Dave

On 10/10/2017 7:30 PM, Andrew Bowley wrote:

Dave and Matthew

 

I have found pull request "Update embedded Android SDK to 24.4.1 #113" (https://github.com/eclipse/andmore/pull/113) and see it includes embedded jar files from the Android SDK.

From the PR conversion I see Matthew state:

 

"I originally used the SDK tools to download them, I've now double checked that the Windows download from https://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html#Other ( http://dl.google.com/android/android-sdk_r24.4.1-windows.zip ) does match the files downloaded."

 

I now understand Dave's comment about Google poorly tagging "what version of the source matches to what they distribute".

I have been using the maven-dependency-plugin "copy" goal to fetch the dependency jars and follow the POM dependency tree to work out what jars are required.

That is why I ran into trouble over the SWT-specific jars like ddmuilib.jar as I could not find them in any online Maven repository.

 

The Android Tools versions I am applying are taken from the android-maven-plugin: android.builder.version=2.3.0 and android.tools.version=25.3.0

 

As first priority, I will complete tracking down all dependencies for above versions and compile them into a spreadsheet so the legal processes can start.

I will then research the new manifest merge design with AndroidBuilder. Once I have grasped that, I can then begin to get an idea of the scope of work to be undertaken.

 

Andrew

---

From: andmore-dev-bounces@eclipse.org [mailto:andmore-dev-bounces@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of David Carver
Sent: Tuesday, 10 October 2017 11:41 PM
To: andmore developer discussions
Subject: Re: [andmore-dev] andmore-dev Digest, Vol 26, Issue 2

Andrew and the Matthew if you two can work together to get a Pull Request up, I can start the CQ process to get the latest versions of the SDK approved.  I will need best guesses to the source code since, Google does a poor job of making sure to tag what version of the source matches to what they distribute.

Thanks for taking the time to get things working.

Dave

 

_______________________________________________
andmore-dev mailing list
andmore-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/andmore-dev

_______________________________________________
andmore-dev mailing list
andmore-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/andmore-dev