[wtp-proposal] Re: update of the Eclipse WTP proposal

[Naci Dai <naci.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have updated JST wiki with the following:

- Mentioned that we have not mentioned all potential JSRs :-)
- Added a paragraph about metadata and "some" support for xdoclet
- Added a use case Exemplar tools for tomcat,jonas,jboss, j2ee 1.4 sdk, -if 
you want to add or delete from the list please do-
- Detailed Web Services support , JSR 109 and JSR 181


At 07:11 PM 5/19/2004, Dominique DE VITO wrote:
> Naci,
>
> Naci Dai wrote :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will go through the JST page to do the following:
> >
> > -Clarify inclusion of JSR 109 - Web Services and not metioning JSRs related
> > to J2EE1.4 spec
> > -Fuzyy sentence - OSS J2EE server
>
> I have corrected the fuzzy sentence - OSS J2EE server - on the second main 
> page,
> not JST page(s). The new phrase is:
>
> "Within scope will be a workbench providing a framework for developing, 
> deploying,
> testing and debugging J2EE applications on standards-compliant server 
> environments,
> as well as an exemplary implementation of a plug-in for at least an open 
> source
> J2EE Server"
>
> Some people were previously thinking the project goal was to re-develop a 
> new OSS
> J2EE server.
>
> Dominique
>
>
> >
> > -Metadata and XDoclet clarification
> >
> > Is there any other thing that I missed?
> >
> > We are on holiday on 19/20 but will be back on Friday.  I'll try to squeeze
> > these in by then
> >
> > At 12:46 AM 5/19/2004, Dominique DE VITO wrote:
> > >Arthur and Naci,
> > >
> > >To be sure: what I have understood is that you will update your subproject
> > >part of
> > >the proposal before the end of the week. Correct me if I am wrong.
> > >
> > >[due to French holidays, I won't be at work Thursday and Friday. But I
> > >think I will
> > >read my emails].
> > >
> > >Until now, I have only do the following updates:
> > >- correction of a fuzzy sentence about plugin to OSS J2EE servers (2nd
> > >main page),
> > >- update of the contributors list (Gorkem Ercan, Jens Lukowski and Xinjie
> > >Zhang
> > >have been added+contribution information, no news about Joss Wright 
> and Kinzan
> > >company at the moment)
> > >
> > >Gorkem has also detailed what he think about proposal contribution
> > >information:
> > >
> > > >         I have two issues concerning individual contributions. The
> > > > contribution information on the proposal does a fine job defining the
> > > > ways to communicate intentions, and also how to deliver patches. What I
> > > > think missing is the information on how to become a committer. What is
> > > > the process, Is there a voting involved? What is the criteria? etc..
> > > >         My second issue is not about infromation missing but more about
> > > > the process. I believe the proposing new features via bugzilla is not
> > > > the best way for an individual contributor to become known by the WTP
> > > > commiters. This is curicial if there is a voting involved on the 
> road to
> > > > become a committer. I think the process should involve a discussion on
> > > > the mailing list first, then a voting period on the new feature and
> > > > later a bugzilla entry(if that is a necessity.)
> > > >
> > >
> > >I will see what to do about it according the current proposal information.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Dominique De Vito
> > >Thales+ObjectWeb
> >
> > Naci Dai,
> > Managing Director
> >
> > eteration a.s.
> > Inonu cad. Sumer sok. Zitas D1-15
> > Kozyatagi, Istanbul 81090
> > +90 (532) 573 7783 (cell)
> > +90 (216) 361 5434 (phone)
> > +90 (216) 361 2034 (fax)
> > http://www.eteration.com
> > mailto:nacidai@xxxxxxx
> > mailto:naci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Naci Dai,
Managing Director

eteration a.s.
Inonu cad. Sumer sok. Zitas D1-15
Kozyatagi, Istanbul 81090
+90 (532) 573 7783 (cell)
+90 (216) 361 5434 (phone)
+90 (216) 361 2034 (fax)
http://www.eteration.com
mailto:nacidai@xxxxxxx
mailto:naci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx