Re: [wtp-incubator-dev] Smoke Test Time

[David Carver <d_a_carver@xxxxxxxxx>]

DOUG SATCHWELL wrote:
> There is a good reason to retain the Saxon plugin, even though it 
> doesn't actually contribute a Saxon processor instance.
>  
> The user is allowed to add new instances of a processor via the 
> Installed Processors preference page. But without the Saxon plugin, 
> they will not be able to add Saxon processors themselves.
The problem is that without the SAXON.jar you can't get a clean 
compile.  We shouldn't check in code that doesn't compile cleanly.  And 
Saxon isn't approved by IP to use.

I agree that it is woudl be great to have the functionality, but there 
are other ways the user can add it themselves, or have Saxon itself 
include the functionality through a plugin for the XSLT editor.


Dave