[wtp-dev] Is it ok for next JSDT to depend on Platform 4.6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[wtp-dev] Is it ok for next JSDT to depend on Platform 4.6?

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:06:09 +0100
Delivered-to: wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/wtp-dev>
List-help: <mailto:wtp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev>, <mailto:wtp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/wtp-dev>, <mailto:wtp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0

Hi all,

I'd like to contribute the official integation of the smart importer into the main JSDT UI bundle, since the API is part of org.eclipse.ui.ide 3.12 that is part of Platform 4.6.
Is it OK to have such dependency to bleeding edge Platform in next JSDT, or do you want to keep backward compatibility so I should rather make it an optional bundle?

Thanks in advance,

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wtp-dev] Is it ok for next JSDT to depend on Platform 4.6?
  - From: Carl Anderson

Prev by Date: [wtp-dev] Development Status meeting reminder
Next by Date: Re: [wtp-dev] Is it ok for next JSDT to depend on Platform 4.6?
Previous by thread: [wtp-dev] new parser@master
Next by thread: Re: [wtp-dev] Is it ok for next JSDT to depend on Platform 4.6?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs