Re: [wtp-dev] Thoughts on moving up to a 3.2 eclipse M5 Integration buil

[Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

John,

Could you do some investigation? Try
a local build using M5 and see what breaks.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx

John Lanuti <jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/08/2006 05:12 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."

To	wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[wtp-dev] Thoughts on moving up to a 3.2 eclipse M5 Integration        build?

Extended Team, 

I am currently blocked on some line items by the state of the common navigator
framework in eclipse platform UI, which continues to be a work in progress.
 Many of these issues have been resolved in eclipse 3.2 M5, however
WTP is still building with 3.2 M4.  Would it be possible, or prudent
to move up to an I build from eclipse? 

Thanks, 

John Lanuti
Software Engineer, IBM Rational
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
t/l 441-7861

"I know this lady way down in my country.
She is so pretty that my eyes throw disguises at me.
Now we will sit and we'll wonder about our future,
But now I'm thinking that today sounds fine to me."  - Of A Revolution_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev