Re: [vtp-dev] VTP 2.0 in CVS?

[Mike Greenawalt <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would vote to use new space for the project. However, the code from 
1.0 that survives will need to keep its structure below the topmost 
directory, or dependencies will get messy.

-- Mike

Trip Gilman wrote:
> Mike -
>     The codebase is available in the current CVS repository.  Tyler is
> working on updating the website to reflect the correct repository location.
> We definitely have some repository maintenance to perform.  I'll put out the
> question of what we should do with the repository.  Should we utilize the
> current repository space (would involve deleting any legacy code not
> surviving into the next release) or request a new location to house our
> project in the future?  The latter of these offers the opportunity to
> reorganize our repository structure to include a level of versioning and
> branching that could provide many more options to our development process in
> the future.  This would be my vote, but I'd like to get everyone's feedback.
>
> Trip
>
>
> On 9/19/07 8:37 PM, "Mike Greenawalt" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
> > Trip, et al -
> >
> > Is the VTP 2.0 codebase, including openVXML contribution from
> > openMethods, stored in an Eclipse Foundation CVS repository yet? I have
> > been reviewing the threads on vtp-dev, and I don't see an announcement
> > to that effect, and the CVS links on the vtp webpage still point to the
> > VTP 1.0 code.
> >
> > I would like to see the current project structure to see how the debug
> > launcher plugin plays in the new environment.
> >
> > When will the new structure be in place?
> >
> > -- Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > vtp-dev mailing list
> > vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev
> >     
>
> _______________________________________________
> vtp-dev mailing list
> vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev
>
>
>