[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- From: "b.kapukaranov@xxxxxxxxx" <b.kapukaranov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:51:56 +0200
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:to:from:subject:date:mime-version:content-type; b=OkjZLQO6EfAFkuWIIKFg8Hp/NjcWsvXvOsP8kUyZheUXbgPVYznCEdSiB2VzWWGllU ulKmRdf0pQTlg26sF1KBeG8sLAyQQR9iNs2LNmy2+/QVUivsfXL8TEeJtd3YNm4/ApQh 1lSdEdoeN/acsIbvZ7I+A7Tg80xmTLY2rLhPU=
You mean to create a tutorial how to modify Virgo's kernel? We have to be careful here since that might cause more issues than expected if everyone starts modifying and making incompatible for the kernel changes just because they saw a tutorial - all these issues will bounce back. Maybe a better and more safe approach would be to leave people contact us when they need something. Wdyt?
Sent from my HTC
----- Reply message -----
From: "Hristo Iliev" <hsiliev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 12:43
Subject: [virgo-dev] Janino
To: "Virgo Project" <virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Since Janino is not big I also vote for packing it with Virgo.
We can also create sample configurations (as comments) to demonstrate how
the users can add other libraries. I find this quite useful. Wdyt?
On 11 January 2011 12:17, Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree, but I didn't want to put words in people's mouths.
> Anyone think differently?
> PS. Nice to see your name in Cyrillic.
> On 11 Jan 2011, at 10:13, ÐÐÑÐÑÐÐÐ ÐÐÐÑÐÐÑÐÐÐÐ wrote:
> Hi Glyn,
> While it doesn't sound so good to make the kernel heavier, it seems that
> Janino won't bring that much overhead. Indeed the commons-compiler.jar is
> required - i just checked that, but its very lightweight. Janino seems like
> a library, so it should not require much time to start up and i guess it
> won't slow the start of the medic bundles(which will start to depend on
> it) notably, however the benefit to have support out-of-the-box and improve
> the UX is more valuable. So i think the benefits of having Janino support
> out-of-the-box are greater than the losses
> Best Regards
> 2011/1/11 Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> A user has raised an enhancement bug  to enable Java boolean
>> expressions to be used in logback filter configuration - a fairly basic
>> requirement which I think we should address. The question is how we should
>> implement the enhancement and I'd value people's opinions on the
>> alternatives I've written up in the bug.
>>  https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=333920
>> virgo-dev mailing list
> virgo-dev mailing list
> virgo-dev mailing list