[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [virgo-dev] Janino

Hi,

Since Janino is not big I also vote for packing it with Virgo.

We can also create sample configurations (as comments) to demonstrate how the users can add other libraries. I find this quite useful. Wdyt?

Regards,
Hristo Iliev


On 11 January 2011 12:17, Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree, but I didn't want to put words in people's mouths.

Anyone think differently?
Â
Regards,
Glyn
PS. Nice to see your name in Cyrillic.

On 11 Jan 2011, at 10:13, ÐÐÑÐÑÐÐÐ ÐÐÐÑÐÐÑÐÐÐÐ wrote:

Hi Glyn,

While it doesn't sound so good to make the kernel heavier, it seems that Janino won't bring that much overhead. Indeed the commons-compiler.jar is required - i just checked that, but its very lightweight. Janino seems like a library, so it should not require much time to start up and i guess it won't slow the start of the medic bundles(which will start to depend on it)Ânotably, however the benefit to have support out-of-the-box and improve the UX is more valuable. So i think the benefits of having Janino support out-of-the-box are greater than the lossesÂ

Best Regards
Borislav

2011/1/11 Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx>
A user has raised an enhancement bug [1] to enable Java boolean expressions to be used in logback filter configuration - a fairly basic requirement which I think we should address. The question is how we should implement the enhancement and I'd value people's opinions on the alternatives I've written up in the bug.

_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev


_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev


_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev