Re: [tm-dev] Neon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [tm-dev] Neon

From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:11:15 +0100
Delivered-to: tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/tm-dev>
List-help: <mailto:tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev>, <mailto:tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/tm-dev>, <mailto:tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 10 Dec 2015, at 15:21, Greg Watson wrote:

there is no particular advantage in participating, other than beinglisted on the Neon page.


I just find this very wrong so I can't not comment.

By being in the release train and on the Neon updatesite the TM projectbecomes something others

can depend on without duplicating it in their update sites.

That is big win for end users (and adopters)

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tm-dev] Neon
  - From: Greg Watson

References:
- [tm-dev] Neon
  - From: Greg Watson

Prev by Date: Re: [tm-dev] [cross-project-issues-dev] Any RSE dependencies in Neon?
Next by Date: Re: [tm-dev] Neon
Previous by thread: Re: [tm-dev] Neon
Next by thread: Re: [tm-dev] Neon
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top