Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tm-dev] TM 3.4.2+ ?

I have created a ticket to get the new job in hudson

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=401715


regards,
Manuel Garcia


Inactive hide details for David Dykstal ---23/02/2013 06:25:59---Martin -- I see no problem with backporting the fix to 3.4.2+.David Dykstal ---23/02/2013 06:25:59---Martin -- I see no problem with backporting the fix to 3.4.2+. There is always a need for a hot fix branch after the "last" ser

    David Dykstal <ddykstal.eclipse@xxxxxxxxx> 
    Sent by: tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

    23/02/2013 06:25

    Please respond to
    TM project developer discussions <tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

    TM project developer discussions <tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc


Subject

    Re: [tm-dev] TM 3.4.2+ ?

Martin --

I see no problem with backporting the fix to 3.4.2+. There is always a need for a hot fix branch after the "last" service release. I will create the R3_4_maintenance branch on Monday when I get back home.

As you point out we will need to create a new build job for it as well although I'm not entirely sure how to do that yet.

I'll also create the 3.4.2+ and 3.5 versions for bugzilla at that time.

-- Dave

On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
    Hi Dave,

     

    I’ve just fixed a regression in the TM Terminal which we unfortunately introduced between Juno SR1 and SR2:

    https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=401386

     

    The fix is trivial, and brings up the question whether we can backport into a TM 3.4.2+ stream ?

    After all, Juno is an LTS stream and this seems like the perfect candidate for it.

     

    What do you think ? – I guess we’d have to create a new branch in git (R3_4_maintenance),

    A Hudson build job, and a 3.4.2+ target milestone in bugzilla.

     

    BTW, a bugzilla “version” for 3.5 would also be a good idea, to indicate defects that are

    Discovered in 3.5 milestones … or do you use the “undefined” version for that ?

     

    Thanks,

    Martin

    --

    Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect – Development Tools, Wind River

    direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

     _______________________________________________
    tm-dev mailing list
    tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top