[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tigerstripe-users] Read-only association ends

Navid,

 

What is the semantics of “frozen”?

 

The set of end points is not really frozen, i.e. invariant. It simply cannot be set directly, only changed internally as a result of another operation.

 

Best regards

 

Marc

 

From: tigerstripe-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tigerstripe-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Navid Mehregani
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 16:37
To: Tigerstripe Users list
Cc: OpenOSS discussion
Subject: Re: [tigerstripe-users] Read-only association ends

 

Hi Marc,

Have you considered setting the 'Changeable' attribute of an association end to 'frozen'?

- Navid

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Flauw, Marc <Marc.Flauw@xxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

 

In RSM I have some navigable associations, where the navigable role is marked as readonly.

However, when I import in Tigerstripe, there is no such property on the aend/zend of an association.

This end will show up as an attribute in the corresponding class and having it readonly is important for the generators.

 

So how do I do to indicate that a given association end is readonly?

 

Thanks and regards,

 

Marc


_______________________________________________
tigerstripe-users mailing list
tigerstripe-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tigerstripe-users