[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [technology-pmc] NatTable Release 1.2.0 - Request for approval
|
Not being part of the PMC the question is maybe those interfaces should
have had a @noimplement in their signature since day 1?
Tom
On 19.01.15 22:57, Eric Rizzo wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> If there are no internal packages, does that mean that all packages are
> exported from the NatTable bundle(s)? If so then this really sounds like
> it needs a major version increase (2.0.0) because adding to interfaces
> is a breaking change. Even if the interfaces aren't "supposed" to be
> used by clients or extenders, they could be.
>
> I'm basing these thoughts on https://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/API_Central
>
>
>
> Other PMC members, any thoughts?
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> On 2015-01-19 14:35, Dirk Fauth wrote:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> since we do not have "internal" packages, those changes are not
>> backwards-compatible. This is the reason why I mention them in the New
>> & Noteworthy.
>>
>> Most of the interfaces are mainly used internally, but NatTable is
>> treated as "open framework", so if users customized their table in
>> that detail, they will face issues. Users that simply use NatTable
>> with its configuration possibilities won't suffer.
>>
>> Greez,
>> Dirk
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Eric Rizzo <eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-01-19 11:41, Dirk Fauth wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I request approval for the NatTable 1.2.0 release.
>>
>> https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.nebula.nattable/reviews/1.2.0-release-review
>>
>> Greez,
>> Dirk
>>
>>
>>
>> Dirk,
>>
>> It's not 100% clear from the release material, are there any
>> backwards-incompatible changes in non-internal packages? I'm
>> asking only because much of the New & Noteworthy talks about
>> additions to interfaces but it doesn't say if those are in
>> packages labeled as "internal."
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> technology-pmc mailing list
>> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>> unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> technology-pmc mailing list
>> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
--
Thomas Schindl, CTO
BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck
http://www.bestsolution.at/
Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
