I don't consider it strange.
Reviews are intended as project checkpoints. You might think of it
as a leverage point that we use to make sure that--among other
things--intellectual property is being correctly tracked. Any IP
that is not appropriately tracked is a potential exposure for the
whole organization, community, and ecosystem (i.e. a bad thing).
Even if we detect an error years later, it is still an error that
needs to be corrected. If not during these checkpoints, then when?
For completeness, it is the IP team's responsibility to assess risk.
In this case, they have deemed that the IP Log approval process will
move forward while the older issues are being addressed.
Wayne
On 05/30/2013 12:13 PM, Igor Fedorenko
wrote:
Does
this mean that IP problems in old releases block teams ability to
delivery new releases that fix the problems? I find this at very
least
strange.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-05-30 12:08 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
The outstanding IP issues need to be dealt
with before the IP log can be
approved. The IP Log must be approved before the release can be
declared
successful.
I need to be able to map every third-party dependency
distributed by the
project to a CQ. If there is no CQ for an identified library,
then you
need to give me a reasonable explanation for why a CQ is not
required,
create a CQ, or remove the file.
For the remediating CQs that you have already raised, I suggest
that you
keep in contact with the IP team to ensure that they are
resolved. Once
those CQs have been processed, resubmit your IP Log.
Wayne
On 05/29/2013 06:22 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
Dear Technology PMC,
m2e project would like to ask for your approval of our 1.4
release. You
can find our release docware in the new system [1].
Unfortunately I am unclear on the status of IPLog at this
point. There
is an outstanding issue concerning older m2e releases, but we
addressed
all issues with 1.4 release so I am not sure if we are
supposed to wait
some more or not.
[1]
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.m2e/releases/1.4.0
--
Regards,
Igor
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
<http://www.eclipse.org>
Learn about Eclipse Projects
<http://www.eclipse.org/projects>
EclipseCon France 2013
<http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2013>
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
|
