Re: [technology-pmc] Faceted Project Framework is ready for creation rev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [technology-pmc] Faceted Project Framework is ready for creation review

From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:35:02 -0800
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)

In the past it's always been a separate document but you bring up a good question - why? Why not just use the proposal? I say, yes, let's just use the proposal. Thanks.

Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:

Regarding the creation review docuware referenced in the development process, can the project proposal serve as this docuware or do I need to put something else together?

[end of message]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [technology-pmc] Faceted Project Framework is ready for creation review
  - From: Wayne Beaton
- Re: [technology-pmc] Faceted Project Framework is ready for creation review
  - From: Anne Jacko

References:
- [technology-pmc] Faceted Project Framework is ready for creation review
  - From: Konstantin Komissarchik

Prev by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] Expected Dependencies
Next by Date: [technology-pmc] [CQ 2841] Full Translation of Eclipse 3.4 Language Pack for DE, FR, JA, KO, ZH, ZH_TW
Previous by thread: [technology-pmc] Faceted Project Framework is ready for creation review
Next by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] Faceted Project Framework is ready for creation review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs