Re: [technology-pmc] Review and recommendations for the ALF project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [technology-pmc] Review and recommendations for the ALF project

From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:58:24 -0700
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation Inc.
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Wayne,
I agree. Eclipse is a place for active projects with active community involvement, not just a place for a CVS repository of otherwise closed or moribund projects.

- Bjorn

Upon approval of the PMC, I intend to announce this requirement for ALF to establish an end-game on the alf-dev list. If ALF intends to pursue either of option (a) or (b), then they must produce a detailed plan for the move. I intend to give them two weeks to respond after which time an archival review will be scheduled on their behalf.

--
New Page 1 [end of message]

References:
- [technology-pmc] Review and recommendations for the ALF project
  - From: Wayne Beaton

Prev by Date: [technology-pmc] [CQ 2568] Derby Version: 10.4.1.3 (using Orbit CQ2500)
Next by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] Review and recommendations for the ALF project
Previous by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] Review and recommendations for the ALF project
Next by thread: [technology-pmc] Our role in the IP process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs