Re: [technology-pmc] Re: Higgins Incubator Status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [technology-pmc] Re: Higgins Incubator Status

From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:09:16 -0800
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation Inc.
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)

Usually the Graduation Review includes a 1.0 Release Review at the same time. Higgins is not doing a release at the same time, breaking with tradition a bit, but it also means that they will not need an IP review.

Anne Jacko wrote:

Bjorn, I just re-read the review documentation here http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/review-mechanisms.php and I am a bit unclear about what a Graduation Review is--it sounds like it is like a Release Review but without a release (or at least that's what the Higgins Graduation Review will be). So is IP clearance necessary for this review?

References:
- [technology-pmc] RE: Higgins Incubator Status
  - From: Mary Ruddy
- [technology-pmc] Re: Higgins Incubator Status
  - From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson
- Re: [technology-pmc] Re: Higgins Incubator Status
  - From: Anne Jacko

Prev by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] Re: Higgins Incubator Status
Next by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] PMC Call minutes posted
Previous by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] Re: Higgins Incubator Status
Next by thread: [technology-pmc] RE: Higgins Incubator Status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs