Re: [tcf-dev] Eclipse / CDT / RSE versions for TCF

["Stieber, Uwe" <Uwe.Stieber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>After all doesn't it make sense to keep the 1.0 version in the 1.0 branch?

 

+1. The document should only contain the information which are relevant for the checked out branch.

 

Just my 2 cents, Uwe

 

 

From: tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pawel Piech
Sent: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2012 18:07
To: TCF Development
Subject: Re: [tcf-dev] Eclipse / CDT / RSE versions for TCF

 

Yes, TCF 1.1 depends on CDT 8.1.x.  I'll update it, but I'm not sure it it makes sense to cram both 1.0 and 1.1 version of the doc into one.  After all doesn't it make sense to keep the 1.0 version in the 1.0 branch?

-Pawel

On 10/10/2012 08:50 AM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:

Hi,

 

Do we have any dependency on CDT 8.1 yet in master ?

 

If yes, the versions in the getting started doc should be updated – ideally separately highlighting the “master” branch versus “1.0” branch.

http://git.eclipse.org/c/tcf/org.eclipse.tcf.git/plain/docs/TCF%20Getting%20Started.html

 

 

Thanks,

Martin

--

Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect – Development Tools, Wind River

direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

 

_______________________________________________

tcf-dev mailing list

tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tcf-dev