Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tcf-dev] Context-query tid parameter issue 
Folks

    I am not as familiar with TCF as others, but this seems pretty logical.

    With almost all other debuggers/debug engines I have  worked with ( GDB, DFW, ... )
    most data exchange allows for pretty free form ( at least HEX and DECIMAL ). Doing it
    at the central point of contact as opposed to making all of the clients do the conversion
    seems wasteful.

    Particularly when the translation for these formats is very well known.

Randy

-----Original Message-----
From: tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tepavich, Scott
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:47 PM
To: TCF Development
Subject: Re: [tcf-dev] Context-query tid parameter issue

Hi Christophe -

>> why don't you simply use double quotes all the time around your property value?

We could.  This will most likely be our workaround for this issue, if the decision is to not support a more freeform solution.

End result:

1.) Update the client to always wrap double-quotes around user entered values.
2.) Update each comparator and inject the logic to handle hex and decimal values for each.
 
My previous suggestion/request just seemed simpler.

Thanks -
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christophe Augier
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 9:06 AM
To: tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tcf-dev] Context-query tid parameter issue

Hi Scott,

why don't you simply use double quotes all the time around your property value? From the service point of view, the property is either a number, a boolean or a string. This is used for parsing the context query but in the end the context query comparator function receives a string. So this is up to the service implementing the comparator to parse the property value.

- Christophe

On 9/21/2012 5:42 PM, Tepavich, Scott wrote:
> When originally adding context query support for breakpoints, we only 
> tested against Linux.  Part of the query allows for the user to enter 
> a TID or PID for context filtering of the underlying OS attribute.
> This worked perfectly due to the nature that Linux supports decimal 
> formatting of these fields.
>
> Recently we attempted to test this same workflow for another RTOS.  
> This OS supports hexadecimal TID and PID values, and this form is more 
> natural for the user in this environment.  When these values are 
> placed in the context-query string and sent to the agent, the
> parse_context_query() routine down in the agent returns an error 
> (since it's expecting a decimal value).
>
> The interface defined for setting the context query, attempts to allow 
> the user to compose/edit the string by hand.  If we attempt to solve 
> the problem in the client, we would need to parse the string when the 
> user has completed entering their text, and convert the hex into decimal.
> Either that or return an error to the user stating that hexadecimal is 
> not a valid form.
>
> The latter is not a solution.  The former is problematic when 
> re-fetching the defined query for the user.  The values in the string 
> would be stored as decimal values, and the client would not have 
> enough criteria to choose which form to display to the user.  A "view 
> as hex | decimal" option could be inserted, but this can be 
> problematic where there are multiple numeric fields and each is 
> typically viewed in different forms.
>
> This could be solved more simply, if we allowed a freeform expression 
> of numerical values as (at a minimum) decimal or hexadecimal for 
> context queries.  I pose the question if it would be acceptable if I 
> updated the context query parser to allow for this?  I think I already 
> know the answer, but feel compelled to ask...
>
> Thanks for your time -
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcf-dev mailing list
> tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tcf-dev
>
_______________________________________________
tcf-dev mailing list
tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tcf-dev
_______________________________________________
tcf-dev mailing list
tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tcf-dev

Back to the top